
The House Oversight and Government Reform (OGR) Committee listened to opinions on the Restoration of America’s Wire Act on Wednesday, the second time RAWA has been the niche of a home hearing.
RAWA gets around more, yet remains as unloved, as that certain girl you went to school with.
AKA the Restoration of America’s Wire Act, RAWA was heard in the House of Representatives on during an Oversight and Government Reform (OGR) session titled, ‘A Casino in Every Smartphone: Law Enforcement Implications. wednesday’
(We’re not sure if they were making a play on the old Herbert Hoover slogan ‘A Chicken in most Pot’ with that session name, but choice that is interesting anyway.)
Four witnesses brought their supposed expertise to Washington, DC, to testify on Rep. Jason Chaffetz’s (R-Utah) legislation that would restore the Wire Act to its pre-2011 interpretation. Four years back, the Department of Justice ruled that the pre-Internet 1961 law that is federaln’t necessarily prohibit online gambling, effectively opening states to legalize online casinos.
‘We’ve had numerous attorneys general, numerous governors saying, ‘You can’t do this to our state,” Chaffetz stated in his remarks. ‘ You just don’t unilaterally replace the law by having an OLC (Office of Legal Counsel) opinion.
‘ That poses a nagging problem for plenty of states. States that have legalized gambling, states like myself [sic] that have no gaming, and don’t want to possess any gaming,’ Chaffetz declared.
Determining RAWA
‘ The interpretation of the Wire Act has been a relevant question before 2011 also it stays a question now,’ State Senator Mark Lipparelli (R-Nevada) testified. ‘You have situation now where you have old law which includesn’t kept up with innovation.’
Lipparelli was instrumental in bringing poker that is online Nevada, as he formerly served due to the fact chairman of the Nevada Gaming Control Board. Throughout the RAWA hearing, Lipparelli was routinely contacted to protect legalization, which he did successfully, in accordance with observers that are many.
Lost throughout the hearing had been a main understanding of what constitutes ‘legal online gambling’ versus ‘illegal on the web gambling’.
FBI Assistant Director for the Criminal Investigative Division Joseph Campbell provided instances that are several his unit has infiltrated criminal syndicates, concealing their identity online to launder money. However, when asked to provide accounts of any currently legal and gambling that is regulated’s transgressions into the exact same vein, Campbell said he could not furnish such examples.
Republican South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson swore that their state’s experience with land-based video poker has been a giant negative, and that ‘gambling addictions proliferated exponentially.’
‘Despite South Carolina’s continued best efforts over the years to protect our residents through the threats posed by gambling, the Department of Justice’s revised interpretation of the Wire Act has opened the doorway to Web gambling, potentially turning any mobile device within our state in to a virtual casino.’
Nebraska attorney Donald Kleine then also expressed issues about states gambling that is legalizing computers and smartphones. ‘on the web gambling easily crosses domestic and worldwide borders and can often be accessed by anyone with Internet access,’ Kleine explained.
Location, Location, Not Just Location
A provided trepidation among RAWA supporters is that current technology cannot accurately determine the whereabouts of the individual trying to enter a online casino. ‘ I think it’s naïve at best to think you are able to put a wall surface on the Internet,’ Chaffetz claimed.
But Chaffetz, whom also serves once the OGR seat, said his concerns are a great deal more than just location.
‘Location is … a core part of it, but it also has to do with your age, it offers regarding your intoxication (level), it has to do with a entire host of things,’ Chaffetz detailed.
Rep. Gary Palmer (R-Alabama) also voiced fears about an adolescent getting a your hands on a smartphone with a casino app installed and losing the adult owner’s entire bankroll. Lipparelli responded by declaring that such a concern is not specific to online gambling, and it’s forget about dangerous, or maybe also less dangerous due to regulated iGaming controls, than a youth obtaining a bank card and going shopping that is crazy the internet.
Those that did attend seemed apprehensive in voting to have Congress get involved with deciding the fate of online gambling for all 50 states though the majority of the 43 OGR committee members skipped the RAWA discussion.
OGR Website Censored
Viewers can afford to watch the RAWA conversation in its entirety on the OGR website, or watch three carefully chosen excerpts posted underneath the hours-long session.
Though the conference ended up being well-rounded and lively, the 3 clips on the OGR website seems to highlight the best exchanges of mainly RAWA proponents.
Chaffetz’s entire inquiry, which was allowed to be limited to five full minutes, but went for over nine, is available for viewing in its entirety. As are comments from Wilson as he recounts an account where a child that is young in a hot car outside a casino as the mom compulsively gambled inside.
Palmer’s questioning, including his opinion that gambling objectives the indegent, can additionally be watched. Palmer was one of, or perhaps the only, representative in attendance that came across like in support of RAWA, besides bill sponsor Chaffetz, of course.
Meyer Lansky Heirs Seek Compensation Claim for Cuban Casino
Meyer Lansky, ‘the Mob’s Accountant,’ who fled the Cuban Revolution, leaving his Havana casinos behind him. (Image: museumsyndicate.com)
When Meyer Lansky built the Habana Riviera Hotel and Casino in 1957, Havana was swinging.
It ended up being, at the time, the largest purpose-built hotel worldwide and Ginger Rogers played on the night that is opening.
Lansky complained that while Rogers could ‘wiggle her ass’ she ‘couldn’t sing a goddam note,’ but the famous Jewish mobster ended up being pleased enough.
After all, times were good: he’d set up himself in the presidential suite and within initial 12 months he would make $3 million from their new task.
But revolution was in the air, and in 1959 Lansky was forced to flee the country, as was his great friend, the dictator and President of Cuba Fulgencio Batista, under whose patronage the United states Mafia had flourished in Cuba.
Many of Havana’s casinos were damaged within the looting and fighting as Castro’s forces swarmed into town. In 1960 all of Cuba’s hotels were nationalized and gambling became illegal.
The entranceway is Open
But, history class aside, now that the US has restored diplomatic ties with its old foe, there is talk of honoring 50-year-old appropriate claims relating to the revolutionary confiscation of property, and Lansky’s heirs believe they will have a claim regarding the Riviera.
Gary Rapoport, a industrial propane salesman from Florida and Lansky’s grandson, says that his mother, his uncle and he, as beneficiaries of Lansky’s trust, should be eligible for some kind of compensation.
‘The resort was taken from my grandfather forcefully,’ he told NBC Miami. ‘Cuba owes my loved ones money.’
‘Trust me,’ he proceeded, ‘I’m not looking to move down to Cuba and take the business over. I believe my family is entitled to something.
‘ We never filed a claim with the national government or hired an attorney earlier because we didn’t think the doorway for negotiating would ever really open. Now it really is open’
‘ Governments change their mind on a complete lot of various things. I’m looking at it as a businessman,’ he added.
Did Lansky Die Broke?
Meyer Lansky, dubbed the Mob’s accountant, was a teenage friend of Bugsy Siegel and Charles ‘Lucky’ Luciano who does later become the relative head of the Genovese Crime Family. He began his career, with Siegel, operating a violent bootlegging operation during Prohibition, but eventually developed a gambling empire that stretched across the planet.
Despite a career that is lifelong planned crime, he was never ever convicted of anything even worse than unlawful gambling.
Lansky invested hugely in Cuba, and the revolution cost him millions. As he died, in 1983 of lung cancer tumors, aged 80, he was ostensibly broke, although the FBI believed he had squirreled away some $300 million into offshore bank accounts.
It’s unclear whether his family does have claim regarding the Riviera. The revolutionaries of 1959 were furious using the corruption of the Batista government and particularly utilizing the way the dictator had sold off land and assets towards the United states Mafia.
Court Bars DraftKings and FanDuel from Operating in New York
Justice Manuel Mendez, who sided with New York Attorney General Schneiderman today and granted an injunction against DraftKings and FanDuel. (Image: uptowncollective.com)
DraftKings and FanDuel have actually experienced a huge blow in their appropriate battle to continue to operate in their state of the latest York.
A judge granted the injunction sought by the New York Attorney General’s Office that prevents the operators from taking bets from New Yorkers for the duration of the case today.
FanDuel agreed to suspend its operations in the state before the outcome of today’s hearing, while DraftKings had defiantly continued to take bets, but must now cease to do this.
While this is certainly perhaps not the end of the lawsuit involving the daily fantasy sports operators and New York, the signs are ominous for the web sites; the court would be unlikely to grant the injunction without strongly favoring the position of the attorney general.
Legal Skirmishes
The litigation escalated in mid-November when AG Eric Schneiderman wrote cease and desist letters to your two sites informing them that their operations constituted ‘illegal gambling’ under ny legislation.
While nyc’s DFS fans protested in the roads, both sites launched appropriate action contrary to the AG’s office so as to challenge the opinion and protect their business within the state.
They also launched an unsuccessful request for a temporary restraining purchase to avoid Schneiderman from issuing the injunction that was issued today.
Solicitors for web sites spent hours that are several a New York Assembly hearing on DFS on Tuesday arguing that the practice had been a game of skill and that transparency and player protection had been paramount towards the industry.
‘ We want to work with you to ensure that fantasy contests are legal, safe for consumers, and continue to offer the great entertainment value that has driven our growth over the previous few years,’ FanDuel’s counsel for policy and government affairs Cory Fox told assembled lawmakers in Albany.
‘ We think that the most readily useful path forward for the fantasy sports industry would be to create regulatory solutions that will enable the millions of users who love fantasy sports to play.’
Something of Value
But today in court the simple concern that Justice Manuel Mendez was required to answer was whether setting a DFS line-up is just a skill or a wager. It is, he replied, the latter.
Web sites’ lawyers had argued that simply because they were not taking ‘wagers’ but entry costs DFS could not be seen as gambling under state legislation, an argument that Mendez dismissed.
‘New York State law that is penal not refer to ‘wagering’ or ‘betting,’ instead it states that a person, ‘risks something of value,” he said. ‘The payment of a ‘entry fee’ as high as $10,600 on a single or more competitions daily could undoubtedly be deemed risking ‘something of value.”
Comentários